THE COMMUNIST PARTY MANIFESTO-KARL MARX &FRIEDRICH ENGELS

The Communist Party Manifesto written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, in which is written the stigma of communism posed as a ghost throughout the nineteenth century Europe, the persecution of communist sympathizers with the idea for his liberal ideas, where the labor force, and the means of production are common, there would be no social classes, there would be a common equality among all belonging.
They argue that the history of all societies that have existed in history have depicted the ongoing struggle between classes, a struggle uninterrupted, each ending in a revolution spurred by the best life possible for members of the proletariat.
Speaking more specifically of the bourgeois class, which has played in the history of the highest revolutionary role, the bourgeoisie has made every professional in the arts, sciences, life in any employee, has become the power the money in your main interest, production and salaried job creation.
The authors take the bourgeoisie as a pest species need to expand throughout the world to work, you need a sale always wide for its products necessarily need to do business in the world, so this has been a cosmopolitan form, through its exploitation of the world market, has decided to create a common whole, ignoring the individuality of each region, and like it or not making it part of their own conditions.
Create a world to the image and likeness of the bourgeois, to create a world where we are forced to believe them if they want to be someone, we are flooded with cheap propaganda even cheaper product, that upon contact with them , we can not say no to consume, is a kind of subliminal messages where you give us cheap goods made by bourgeois industries, not to resist and take the first step to become one more of the bourgeois machine.
The bourgeoisie appropriates and agglomerated into a single point all that is necessary for life, the means of production, has centralized power has fallen a lot in a few hands, which means that only a few can have a positive life within this mode of production, has made many people dependent of the few those with the weapons to survive.
The need for the proletariat to be sold as a commodity, where all you have is their labor, who have lack and move regular vicissitudes of competition, where only the fittest can continue with employment, except that the workers have had to fight or rather, advocate for their jobs, as many have been displaced by machinery, another of the inventions of the bourgeois class.
Take the figure of the proletariat as the only revolutionary class matter, saying that all other classes are just another part of the big machine capital, where small workers who have only a small business, are forced to fight and implement the level of revolution to the ruling class, in order to preserve and not destroy your instrument work, their own means of production.
Turning to the relationship that the Communists would the proletariat, the only difference may be the Communist Party of the other proletarian parties is that the Communists fight for a common good, a common good that not only distinguishes the proletariat of a single sector if not fighting for the proletariat of the whole world, and it is said that the Communists are therefore the most resolute, they always drive sector workers' parties of all countries.
The Communist Party and other labor parties share a common purpose which is to constitute the proletariat as a class, overthrow of bourgeois rule and Tomaren hands political power, why is says that the mastermind of each of the revolutions of twentieth century was Marx, going from the Russian, Chinese, Mexican, etc.., driven by the same principles that the communist party talks.
While the middle class that he realized that his path was merely denying conformity to the proletariat, decided to exercise a kind of communism bourgeois or bourgeois socialism, where philanthropists belonged among others, economists, abolitionist animal cruelty, etc. Which sought to draw on systems having and bourgeois socialism for the proletariat no longer disagreed both with them, writing in these same quotes in which they were told and tried to convince the proletariat that social movements or revolts were not the output to obtain improvements in their working conditions, only thing was supposed to be so serious as ordered.

On the other hand there is the current critical utopian socialism or communism, which says it wants to improve the social conditions of life of all members of society, even the better-off. Hence, constantly appeal to the whole society without distinction, with a clear preference for the ruling class.
For this reason, they repudiate all political action, including any action with revolutionary dyes, what they want is to reach their goal by peaceful, propose measures that favor proletarian ideals such as the abolition of the contradictions between city and field, family, private profit, wage labor, the annunciation of social harmony and the transformation of the state in a simple production management.
Finally we talk about the position of the Communists to the various opposition parties, the Communists have great presence mainly in Western Europe, in countries with higher and more industrial developments emerged in the capitalist environment, in short, they support in Generally every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political status.
Finally, they labor in general for the union and agreement of the democratic parties of all countries, so the Communists also reject conceal their views and intentions, and openly express their purposes can be achieved only by the forcible overthrow of all previous social order, the proletarians have nothing to lose but the chains that bind them to the system.